Receive updates by email

Enter your address to receive emails of the new content added to this site. No spam.

  

Subscribe in a reader
Search this blog
Blog index
« Dr Banerjee – anonymity ? | Main | Dividends and NIC »
Saturday
Jul042009

Dr Banerjee – a big up

And to her counsel and solicitors, who acted pro bono.

In HMRC v Banerjee [2009] EWHC 62 (Ch), the High Court has upheld a registrar’s claims that her training expenses were incurred wholly, exclusively and necessarily in the performance of the duties of her employment, under what is now ITEPA 2003, s.336(1) (previously ICTA 1988, s.198(1)). The judgment will receive plenty of attention, and the Revenue must now be having second thoughts over whether it was a good idea for them to take the appeal when they had already succeeded, albeit with some luck on their side, in the earlier case, displaying similar facts, of HMRC v Decadt [2007] EWHC 1659 (Ch).

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>